Road and Track car reviews

January 15, 2020
2015-Ford-Mustang-GT-Chris

Dodge Neon: For the hobbled-of-mind 41-year-old who raises a stink at the mall-bank because he still doesn't understand overdraft charges.

This was Chrysler's peak. It never got any better than the first generation Neon. Right now, Chrysler is spreading BenGay all over its Hellcat biceps in a douche move to look buff, virile, and Alpha. Sure, the Hellcat is a haymaker, but what about calculated jabs and technique? What happened to Chrysler's small car market? Yes, the Dart does exist. Yes, it's a Fiat C-Evo platform. But the Neon was a 100 percent American concept (partially built in Mexico). The Neon was one of the fastest economy cars in the 90's. The Neon was cheaper than most incarnations of the Civic, Escort, and Sentra. The Chrysler DOHC 16v 2.0L I4 made 150 horsepower even before tuners got to it.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Dodge Neon: For Neck-Tattoo-Mom who uses profanity in front of her kids at the scratch-and-dent grocery.

The Neon's only logical competitor by price-point was the ubiquitous GM J-Body (Chevy Cavalier, Pontiac Sunfire, Cadillac Cimarron). The Neon sold for around $13, 000 in 1995 ($20, 357 in 2015 money). The third generation Chevy Cavalier sold for about $12, 500 ($19, 573 in 2015). Both cars, with their highest trim engines, would make 150hp, but the Neon weighed 2, 500 pounds maxed out, while the Cavalier weighed 2, 800 pounds wet. The Neon was nine inches shorter than the Cavalier, while both cars had an almost equal 104 inch wheelbase. Pound-for-inch-for-dollar, the Neon was more chuckable and fun for only $500 more than the Cavalier.

Dodge Neon: A first car for a high-fructose corn syrup boy-boobed seventeen-year-old named Skyler.

Why don't we remember how fun the ACR and R/T versions of the Neon were?

We don't remember the Neon fondly because the engineers didn't fully understand how rough novice tuners would be on engines. The Neon's optional 2.0 twin-cam engine used a timing belt rather than a sturdier timing chain. That would be fine if the engine was a non-interference design... but it wasn't. The racy, revvy, fun machine was powered by an interference engine. An interference engine isn't inherently bad, it just means that the valves protrude into the cylinder farther on the downstoke than the piston travels on the upstroke. That means when the timing belt broke, because you spent your money on a Street Glow ground effects kit, instead of on general maintenance, the pistons would crash into the valves. Non-interference engines won't do that.

If you switched to Velcro shoes because "I got enough B.S. in my life, " this is the car for you.

Also, the DOHC 16 valve 2.0L I4's power came in way high on the rev range, around 6, 500 RPM. That meant you had to work the five-speed manual all the time to squeeze out the advertised 150hp. These little engines, working in an already light body, were trashed and thrown around every back-road along the east coast, where they twisted and buckled with every crash. The Neon's lightness was its greatest advantage and its worst attribute. The Neon wasn't safe.

Dodge Neon: The official car of "That family who has a yard sale every weekend."

If you build a light car, you automatically build a fun car. It's the benchmark of the car-guy lifestyle. We, as gearheads, love lightness. We grab our crotches and bellow "Who needs safety?! I'm a MAN!"

Dodge Neon: The official car of ending your trip to Big Lots with a Disorderly Conduct charge.

Watch this crash test of a 1st gen Neon:

Look at the A-Pillar. The A-Pillar is the part of the car that bridges the gap between the windshield and the front passenger window. In my videos for, I moan over A-Pillars getting thicker and causing big blind spots. Yet, I must concede that thin A-Pillars, if they are too light and too weak, cause the passenger compartment to buckle, the roof to collapse, and allow the dash, windshield, and door to crush the front occupants in a crash.

Source: www.roadandtrack.com

INTERESTING FACTS
INTERESTING VIDEO
Nissan GT R Nismo driven on road and track, Car Review
Nissan GT R Nismo driven on road and track, Car Review
Mercedes AMG GT Road and Track Tested | Car Review
Mercedes AMG GT Road and Track Tested | Car Review
Video: BMW M235i Road And Track Review | SA Car Fan
Video: BMW M235i Road And Track Review | SA Car Fan
Share this Post
latest post
follow us